Water injection is a technology that is nearly as old as the car itself. However, like many automotive technologies, it has waxed and waned as fashion has dictated. Water injection has the ability to suppress detonation, allowing the use of higher cylinder pressures. It is easy to control and relatively simple to install. In times of tight emission controls, decreasing fuel octane and rising petrol costs, water injection is one of the best ways of controlling detonation. And it has another major advantage over taking other approaches - the 'fuel' is available at almost zero cost!

How it Works

Water injection is used to suppress detonation. Detonation occurs when the flame front does not burn progressively across the combustion chamber but instead explodes into action. This causes a massive and sharp increase in combustion pressures which can damage pistons, rings and even heads. Detonation can sometimes be heard as a 'tink, tink' sound coming from the engine. The piston and head shown here has suffered severely from detonation.

Water injection works in three ways. Firstly, when the water is injected into the intake system prior to the cylinder head, the small droplets absorb heat from the intake air. Water has a very high specific heat rating (it can absorb lots of energy while only slowly increasing in temperature) and so the intake air is initially cooled. Next, the small drops of water start to evaporate. Water has a very high latent heat of evaporation (its change of state absorbs a lot of heat) and so the intake air charge is cooled still further. Finally, when the remaining water droplets and water vapour reach the combustion chamber, steam is produced. This acts as an anti-detonant and also keeps the interior of the engine very clean, so preventing the build-up of carbon "hot spots".

Water injection was first experimented with in the 1930s. At the time it was discovered that detonation could initially be prevented by enriching the air/fuel ratio. As cylinder pressures rose still further and that approach ceased being effective, the injection of water into the intake air stream was found to prevent detonation. Interestingly, the detonation remained suppressed, even if the air/fuel ratio was then leaned-out. This occurred because the excess fuel was being used to cool the combustion process. When water replaced fuel in performing this function, less fuel was then required.

This has major implications for both emissions and fuel economy at high engine loads. In fact Saab on some of their recent turbocharged cars has used water injection at high loads in conjunction with leaner air/fuel ratios to reduce emissions output and improve fuel consumption. To put this another way, at high engine loads it is possible to reduce the amount of fuel being used, replacing it with water without sustaining any loss of power!

Always Water?

While I have referred to 'water' injection, many systems add a 50/50 mix of water and methanol, or water and methylated spirits. Research carried out during World War II indicated that pure water is best at suppressing detonation, while a 50/50 mixture of water and methanol permits the greatest power output before detonation occurs. One reason for this may be that the alcohol burns more slowly than petrol, so causing peak cylinder pressures to occur at a later crankshaft rotation, increasing torque.

The question of whether a water injection system can increase engine power is a contentious one. While the intake air will be lower in temperature (and so denser) when a water injection system is operating, the presence of an increased amount of water vapour in the air means that there is less room for oxygen. It is for this reason that dry air (that is, air with a low relative humidity) can allow an engine to develop more power. So when the air is cooler but its water vapour content is higher, will more power be developed? If no changes are made to air/fuel mixtures, theoretically the two factors almost exactly cancel each other out.

This means that if water injection is used without any changes made to the tuning of the engine, improvements in power are possible but not probable. However, if the engine air/fuel ratio is leaned out, or boost is increased, or the ignition timing is advanced, more power is very likely. Supercharged aircraft engines using water injection had mechanisms that leaned out the air/fuel ratio simultaneously with the operation of the water injection. However it is very important to note that making random changes to the air/fuel ratio and ignition timing at high engine loads can be very dangerous for the health of the engine. Such changes should be made with care - it is very easy to blow up a forced induction engine with random leaning of the mixtures and/or ignition timing changes!

Both methanol and methylated spirits mix well with water when it is required that a mix be injected. However it is important to note that both of these mixtures are inflammable and so the anti-detonant injection system's storage container, pump and lines should all be designed and installed with the carriage of an inflammable liquid in mind.

Note that it has been suggested in some circles that the water can be directly added to the petrol by using a solvent such as acetone. However, I have not heard of anyone actually doing this!

Water Injection Systems

A water injection system should:

• Distribute the water equally to each cylinder;
   
• automatically start the water flow prior to it being required;
   
• have positive shut-off (eg via a solenoid valve) when water injection is not required;
   
• either warn the driver or decrease engine power (eg by dropping boost) should the water supply be exhausted;
   
• be very reliable.

Many aftermarket water injection systems do not satisfy any (let alone all!) of these criteria.

To be most effective, a water injection system should add water in proportion to the changing airflow. In other words, the flow of water should match the flow of air, with small amounts of water being added at low loads and high amounts at high loads. If very accurate control of the water injection quantity is available, maximum water flow per cfm of induction air should occur at peak torque when cylinder pressures are at their highest.

The water should be injected in as fine a spray as possible. Doing this results in each drop being smaller, increasing the surface area to volume ratio and so promoting evaporation. The smaller drops are also less inclined to fall out of the air, wetting the intake manifold walls and perhaps then being distributed unevenly from cylinder to cylinder. A small droplet size means that a high-pressure pump and a well-designed spray nozzle are required.

An alternative to a pump is to use boost pressure to force the water through a nozzle. If this system is adopted, the spray can be used only in a forced induction car with the water introduced prior to the compressor. A very special nozzle is also needed if the spray is to be sufficiently fine to pass through the compressor without long-term damage occurring. People using coarse droplet water injection in front of turbos have reported that over a period of time the edge of the compressor blades develop a serrated edge - presumably from the impact of the water droplets.

The injection of water can occur at a number of different points within the intake system. In a naturally aspirated car, the nozzle is usually situated prior to the throttle body. In a forced induction car, the nozzle can be situated:

• before the compressor,
   
• after the compressor
   
• after the compressor but before an intercooler
   
• after an intercooler.

URL suggest a nozzle position just prior to the throttle body for road cars, while the supercharged aircraft of many years ago used up to 18 nozzles positioned around the supercharger exit diffuser. Testing of the two systems discussed below indicated that the best nozzle location should be found through experimentation. The amount of water that needs to be added to an engine is also best assessed through trial and error. If the flow of water is initially high and then is slowly reduced, this approach can be done quite safely. However, testing on aircraft engines indicates that the mass of water required to suppress detonation is 20-30 per cent of the weight of the total liquid charge (that is, the water plus the petrol) being consumed. The system should be configured so that water is only ever injected when there are high intake airflows.

 

Water Injection versus Intercooling

So which is better if you are running a forced aspirated car - water injection or intercooling? Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Intercooling is a reliable means of reducing intake air temperatures and depending on the approach chosen, it can be a very simple system. However, it should be noted that while air/air intercoolers have few component parts, water/air intercooling is more complex than water injection. Intercooling systems require little or no maintenance, and a good intercooling system will provide an engine power increase in addition to preventing detonation. However, intercoolers are much larger than water injection systems and are generally harder to package. Finally, all intercoolers cause a restriction to intake flow.

Water injection is very effective at preventing detonation. It is not subject to efficiency drop-offs through heat soak and causes no restriction to intake flow. It is easy to fit as an add-on to an existing system, and because its components can be spread around the car, it is generally very easy to package. Unlike intercooling, water injection will not necessarily give a power increase. However, the biggest disadvantage is the requirement to carry a relatively large water tank - and to keep on filling it!

 

	Advantages	Disadvantages
Intercooling	Reliable System can be very simple Always improves power System break-down usually immediately recognisable No ongoing maintenance	Weight Bulk Major underbonnet changes Usually poses a flow restriction
Water Injection	Very effective at preventing detonation System components can be spread around car Can be used to inject octane booster Generally low cost No intake flow restriction Reduces emissions	Requires regular filling of water tank System breakdown can be difficult to recognise Large filled water tank is heavy Variable flow systems are complex Effectiveness will vary depending on weather